Planning – Application Comments

I am still objecting to 46 Worcester Road plans, you say no one objected to the front extension 1.715. I did in my first letter. My objestion is this will put my living room in darkness blocking my light as it will be very large and very close to my only windows in my living room. I have seen this done on a very few properties but not that large, i wonder why they want their front window so close to the pavement where people walk by. I will have to have my lights on all year round. I believe you all visited Mr Ricgards property recently, i was told by Aaron Miles you were going to try get Mr Richards to alter his plans for something more acceptable to other extensions in the area. His double extension plans are more acceptable. But the extra 2.10 metre will still put me in darkness. I was told by Mr Richards i am not entitled to light, but it seems hes entitled to take my light away. There is only one extension around here 7 metres long and thats Mr Langtons, the guy who did the plans for Mr Richards i believe he is a Building inspector and works for the council. I believe there is a difference as he only has one neighbour, as at one side of his house is what we call a 10 foot where cars passby. Mr Langton told me that doesnt make any difference, i beg to differ only upsetting one person instead of two. I am sorry to go on, but i feel very strongly about this. I do understand they need more room as they have 3 children but most people with 3 children move to a larger house instead of buying a house with a front and back garden and wanting to concrete every inch of it. I'm surprised its allowed with Hull being on a floor plain. It seems no one seems to care anymore about other people, they just want what they want and thats it.